A significant number of candidates expressed concern over the competency-based questions, which they said required deeper conceptual understanding and consumed more time than anticipated.

Several students exiting examination centres reported that while the paper adhered to the prescribed syllabus, the framing of questions, particularly case-study and application-based problems, posed challenges.

"It was not impossible, but it was definitely tougher than the sample papers. The competency-based questions needed careful reading and multi-step calculations," said a student in Delhi.

The exam format this year placed greater emphasis on competency-focused assessment, aligning with the board's stated objective of testing analytical skills and real-world application rather than rote learning.

However, many candidates felt that the balance between difficulty level and allotted time was uneven. "Time management became a problem. Even well-prepared students struggled to attempt all questions," said another examinee in Mumbai.

On social media platforms, hashtags related to the Maths paper quickly began trending, with posts ranging from frustration to anxiety.

Some users called for a re-examination, while others urged the board to consider moderation or grace marks. "Students are not against competency-based questions, but the paper felt more complex than expected," read one widely shared comment.

Teachers and subject experts offered mixed views. While some acknowledged that the paper appeared slightly more challenging compared to previous years, others argued that it was conceptually sound.

"The paper tested understanding rather than memorisation. Students who practised higher-order thinking questions should have been able to handle it," said a Mathematics teacher from Bengaluru.

Education analysts noted that transitions toward competency-based evaluation often generate initial discomfort among students accustomed to traditional patterns.

"Such reforms aim to improve learning outcomes, but consistency in difficulty level and adequate preparatory resources are crucial," an academic observer said.

Despite the criticism, there were also students who described the paper as fair. "It was challenging but manageable. The tricky parts were mostly in the application-based section," said a candidate from Chennai.

The Central Board of Secondary Education has not issued an official response regarding student feedback at the time of writing. Typically, the board reviews examination performance trends before deciding on moderation policies.

With major subjects underway, student reactions to this paper have reignited conversations around exam design, preparedness, and the evolving assessment landscape in India's school education system.