Comparisons are being drawn to past cases where male public figures like Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia faced significant backlash and legal trouble for their remarks. People are asking, if they were targeted, why should Sachdeva be exempt?

Disturbing Video: Baby Thrown in Bin, Women Laugh

At its core, both cases, whether involving male or female comedians are instances of overreaction. In a country where humor is often met with extreme responses, legal action over stand-up comedy raises questions about freedom of expression.

However, the issue has now shifted beyond comedy itself. Many believe that men are disproportionately punished for similar statements while women escape legal scrutiny, making this a debate about gender bias rather than just an offensive joke.

Founder to Intern: CEO Hunts Job After $1B Sale

Supporters of Sachdeva argue that comedy thrives on pushing boundaries and that such jokes should not be taken too seriously. On the other hand, critics say that the public and law enforcement have been far harsher towards men for comparable statements, indicating a selective application of outrage.

Goodbye Ola-Uber: Drivers Back New Govt App

They point to previous cases where male comedians were arrested, harassed, or boycotted for their words, while Sachdeva's remarks, despite being widely circulated, have yet to face similar consequences.

Ultimately, the controversy highlights the inconsistencies in how society reacts to offensive humor. While it may be fair to criticize the joke itself, the larger debate is now about whether legal action is applied equally, regardless of gender.