Many teachers who joined before the TET rule argue that writing the exam after 20-25 years of service is unfair, but the TET Promise may not be enforceable without central government support.

The TET Promise is not under the control of the AP government alone, as the test is mandated by the RTE Act and NCTE regulations. This means the state cannot grant exemptions unilaterally. Jagan made a political commitment without clarifying these legal aspects, leading to confusion and frustration among teachers who feel their genuine concerns have been overlooked.

For the TET Promise to be implemented, the NCTE and Central Government must collaborate. Any decision by the coalition government must withstand judicial scrutiny to be valid. Without a clear legal path, promises to sidestep these issues risk remaining empty slogans, further eroding trust among educators.

In conclusion, Jagan must present a concrete plan for the TET Promise that aligns with legal requirements. People expect viable solutions, not difficult promises. Until he explains a clear strategy, this pledge will likely remain another political slogan rather than a tangible benefit for teachers.